Health Insurance Rates Drop 60%

May 18th, 2012 No comments
Health care reform will result in lower health insurance rates, up to 60% lower than current rates. Yes, health care reform seems to be working . . . for those who live in Maine.  

Falling health insurance rates due to health care reform is the lead in of a post at The Maine Wire.
PL 90, the free market based health reform law, was passed last March by a Republican majority in Maine’s legislature. Governor Paul LePage signed the bill in a ceremony at the statehouse amid cries from Democrats that it wasn’t right for Maine.
Well that's a twist.


Republican health care reform but Democrat's protest the move.
The law has resulted in a drop in rates for small group plans but individual rates are expected to drop as much as 60% . . . for some age groups . . .


Maine has two provisions on the books that make health insurance premiums unaffordable for most folks. Community rating and guaranteed issue, two things that are cornerstones of Obamacare, drive premium rates through the roof.


Community rating means essentially everyone pays the same rate, regardless of age or gender. Guaranteed issue means anyone can buy coverage, regardless of their health or existing medical conditions.


In the parlance of Obamacrap, "Insurance companies can no longer discriminate against you because you have a pre-existing condition".


The flip side of that argument is, "Insurance companies will be allowed to charge significantly higher premiums to those who are healthy to pay for the claims of those who have expensive medical conditions".


That is analogous to auto insurance carriers charging drivers with perfect records the same rate as one who has had multiple DUI's and speeding violations. Or banks imposing much higher interest rates to the most creditworthy so they can also extend credit to those with severely damaged credit.
PL 90, the health reform law that Republicans guided through the legislature despite passionate opposition from Democrats, expanded the “rate bands” to allow a wider variation in cost between different aged applicants. In the past, insurance companies had to treat a 21-year-old and 55-year-old as basically the same. The new law allows for distinction in age groups. 
Once the new rates are approved, a 21 year old will pay $215 per month for a plan with a $2,000 deductible. Before health care reform, that person would pay $448 per month.


The rates are still high, mostly because the guaranteed issue provisions remain in play, but are much more affordable. A healthy 21 year old in Atlanta, Georgia could buy a comparable plan from Cigna for $98 per month.


So the Obamacrap-like guaranteed issue provisions mean healthy people will still pay double the normal premium so everyone can have health insurance.
Seems fair, right?
“Getting more young people into the market is a major plus for all Mainers and was a primary goal of the law,” Allumbaugh notes. “As this happens, the claims experience tends to improve and it can lower the rates even further for all age groups,” Allumbaugh said.“This is precisely the impact the health reform law aimed for, lowering rates generally, but in a way that helps our insurance markets reverse the death spiral and begin to grow.”
Death spiral. Now that's a word you don't hear every day.


Hyper-regulation by the Maine Department of Insurance has resulted in most health insurance carriers leaving the state. Anthem Blue Cross controls most of the health insurance market in Maine. Less competition, higher rates.


The same thing we will have in 2014 when Obamacrap is in play.


How is this health care reform idea working for you?


About as well as hope and change.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Java Overboard!

May 17th, 2012 No comments
A few years ago, we noted that even just a few cups of coffee each day might help "slow the progress of Alzheimer’s disease and even reverse the condition."

Turns out, more may be even better, because loading up on the brew may actually help with longevity:

"[M]en who drank at least six cups of coffee a day had a 10 percent lower chance of dying during the 14-year study period than those who drank none. For women, the risk was 15 percent lower"

And it's not necessarily the caffeine, either; regular and decaf see similar results.

I do have a problem with the article's headline, though:

"6 cups a day? Coffee lovers less likely to die, study finds"

Really? Last I looked, the risk of dying is pretty much 100%, beverage of choice notwithstanding.
Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Be Careful What You Wish For . . .

May 16th, 2012 No comments
The folks at Consumer Reports open their mail bag . . .


I'm pregnant. Can my health plan refuse maternity coverage?



Q. I thought I had completed my family, and was confident of never getting pregnant again because I had an IUD. So we bought an individual family plan from Blue Shield of California that excludes pregnancy. But I got pregnant anyway. I asked to be moved to a plan that covers pregnancy, and was denied because of my "pre-existing condition." Is this legit?

A. It sure is. In every health-plan underwriting manual I have ever seen, pregnancy is on the list of conditions that will get you turned down flat for new individual coverage.Moreover, the vast majority of health plans sold to individuals exclude maternity coverage. A recent study of some 3,300 individual policies by the National Women's Law Center, a Washington, D.C. advocacy group, found that only 12 percent included maternity coverage, and half of those were in the handful of states with laws that require it. In a few states, including Colorado, Connecticut, Nevada, and South Carolina, not a single plan available to a 30-year-old woman included maternity coverage.

In other states, you can get limited maternity coverage through an add-on rider that costs extra, but typically must wait a year or more before the benefits kick in, meanwhile paying an additional premium that may cost more than the basic policy itself.

"You can buy coverage in $1,000 or $2,000 increments, but by the time you've waited, you get back $100 or so if it's a normal delivery," says Judy Waxman, the center's vice president for health and reproductive rights. "It's just not worth it."This is one of many ways that individual health insurance is inferior to group coverage, which has included maternity care without exception for years.

But you, dear California resident, are in luck. Last year, California became the ninth state to pass a law requiring all individual health plans to cover maternity care. The new law takes effect July 1, 2012. According to a spokeswoman for Blue Shield of California, as of that date, the new benefit will automatically be added to all the company's individual plans, starting immediately. If your due date is any time after that, your remaining expenses for prenatal care and delivery will be covered.

The Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, will fix this problem for good. As of Jan. 1, 2014, all individual health plans sold in the U.S. must include maternity coverage. And you can sign up for a plan even if you're already pregnant, because insurers won't be able to turn you down for any pre-existing condition.

Yes dear readers, Obamacare will "fix" all that. Starting in 2014 all major medical plans will be required to cover maternity. Not only will men have to pay for maternity coverage, but so will pre-menstrual girls, post-menopausal women, sterilized women and those who, for any number of reasons, are unable to get pregnant.

Everyone will see their rates increase. How much? We will get an idea by looking at California.

Expect Dave Fluker to post something on his blog as soon as July rates are released, but don't expect it to be pretty.

All this is part of that spreading around the wealth thing.



Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Dying for a quiet ride

May 16th, 2012 No comments
File this under "Risky Unintended Consequences:"

"Hybrids are so quiet that pedestrians never hear them coming ... NHTSA studies ... confirmed what many long suspected: Hybrids and electric cars are too quiet for the blind or even the fully sighted to hear them coming."

Ooops.

On the other hand, I was taught to always look both ways before crossing the street.

Of course, that doesn't really apply to the sight-impaired, who count on a certain noise level to assess risk before stepping off the curb. 'Tis a puzzler.

Then again, maybe not:

"Thanks to the Pedestrian Safety Act of 2010 ... the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration is required to initiate a rulemaking process for minimal vehicle noise—not how quiet, but how loud a car must be." [emphasis in original]

"Initiate a process." As in, start to consider the idea of a study to determine how to proceed.

How many people will die (or be seriously injured) while they commission the blue ribbon panel?

And the problem's only going to get worse, of course, as more and more electric and hybrid cars roll off the assembly lines and into traffic. The good news is that the Chevy Volt contains its own vehicle announcement system:

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

And even MORE ObamaFail©

May 15th, 2012 No comments
In case you missed it yesterday:


Now what does that banner remind me of?
Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Not really at odds at all

May 12th, 2012 No comments
In the HWR Joe Paduda made the following point, which has been made by others on the left;

http://www.joepaduda.com/archives/002323.html

"- most GOP-authored bills allow people to shop for insurance across state lines, which seems to be at odds with other GOP concerns that health insurance should be the purview of the states, and the Feds ought not to be involved"

There is nothing at odds in this belief and it has been settled case law for decades. Insurance is regulated where it is sold. This means if I live in MA but drive to DE to purchase an insurance policy the policy will be regulated in DE where it was sold. This is not only commonly done between states but also countries. There are types of risk, usually P&C, that businesses and individuals will insure offshore. Since the policy is purchased outside of America it is not subject to American Insurance laws. You need to be careful when you do this as there are tax issues and money laundering concerns but as long as you are legitimately purchasing insurance for an insurable risk, leaving the jurisdiction where the risk resides to buy insurance in another jurisdiction in order to be subject to that jurisdictions laws is far from new or uncommon, despite what the left would like you to believe.
Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Prozac Nation

May 11th, 2012 No comments
Seems we may really be a Prozac Nation after all. According to the UK Mail Online, the US is a pill popping nation, consuming 80% of the world supply of pain pills.     

That's enough drugs to give every single American 64 Percocets or Vicodin. And pain pill prescriptions continue to surge, up 600 percent in ten year, thanks to doctors who are more and more willing to hand out drugs to patients who are suffering. 
That's pretty frightening.


Nationwide, police are reporting increases in robberies and other crimes by people who are addicted to oxycodone and hydrocodone, the key ingredient in most prescription pain pills. 

 One of the people lured into crime by drug dependency was Rich Elassar, 36, who once owned a successful business in New Jersey.

But an addition to painkillers led to him taking 90 Percosets a day, he told BBC. When the money ran out he was desperate for more drugs.
One day, he walked into a bank and handed the teller a note demanding cash. He was caught and arrested shortly after the robbery.
Sounds like a Nurse Jackie episode. I am blown away by the thought of someone taking 90 Percocet's a day. Years ago I took one to cope with pain following surgery and it knocked me for a loop.
Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

From the P&C Files: Marvel-ous insurance

May 11th, 2012 No comments
The recently released blockbuster "The Avengers" is (apparently) filled with excitement, mayhem and thrills. But have you ever wondered what kind of damage those great battle scenes might wreak in real life?

Me, either (hey, it's suspended disbelief, after all).

Still, some folks do ponder these things, and I'm kinda glad they do. Else how would we know, for instance, the kind of hits insurers might face if these were real claims (assuming they were covered in the first place):

"Nick Fury and “The Avengers” save the world from imminent doom ... but in real life ... would cost New York City a fortune in the process"

Total (hypothetical) price tag?

"Real-life ‘Avengers’ would cost New York $160 billion in damages"

Still skeptical?

Oh ye of little faith:

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Pennsylvania Dreamin’

May 10th, 2012 No comments
We first reported on the collapse of long term care insurance carrier Penn-Treaty in late '09. Hard to believe that 2-and-a-half years later, this is still making news.

But it is, and not in a good way:

"[I]n an unprecedented decision of significant national consequence, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has disallowed efforts by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department (PID) to liquidate ... Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company and its subsidiary American Network Insurance Company."

The ruling seems to hinge on the Court's belief that the company can be "rehabilitated" (a fancy word for "brought back to life"). This is a potentially historic ruling because it marks "the first time a petition to liquidate an insurance company has been defeated in Pennsylvania." By contrast, these things are usually rubber stamped once the Department of Insurance has deemed the case hopeless.

We've been offered the opportunity to speak with someone "in the know" about this case and its national implications (whatever these may be), and have expressed an interest in doing so. More to follow (fingers crossed hopefully).

[Hat Tip: Robin Ireland]
Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Dealing on Health Care

May 9th, 2012 No comments
Here's a thought: as we noted as recently as yesterday, government distorts the costs of health care, making it more - not less - expensive. Wouldn't it be great if we let the market determine what health care should cost?

Well, that's exactly what some enterprising folks out in San Fransisco are doing:

"Daily deal sites ... are giving the uninsured and underinsured a chance to afford health care services ... Daily deal sites are offering more than dental visits. Dr. Julie Orman, a chiropractor, recently offered a $25 LivingSocial deal for care"

This is precisely how insurance used to work: people paid for the small, routine services out of pocket, and providers vied for their (cash) business. Insurance was for the catastrophic claims, like heart attacks and strokes. And this is duly noted, as well:

"Don’t expect to find deals on major surgery, though. Doctors mainly offer discount for elective services"

Quite so.

And it's good business for the docs, as well. FoIB David Williams, proprietor of the Health Business Blog, acknowledges that in the article. But he also offers this advice:

I would be careful about the upselling and I would also be worried that a [provider] once they have you in the office may find some kind of problem

True enough, but that can happen just as easily to an insured patient. And it may well be that there is something else wrong; perhaps that sore throat is a harbinger of cancer, for example, and is treatable due to that early detection.

Caveat emptor, anyone?
Categories: Uncategorized Tags: